450-700ms), making gaming and other online activities that require fast response times much more feasible on Starlink than Viasat. Starlink also has lower latency than Viasat (25-50ms vs. If you are a current user of Starlink internet service, then you're experiencing a broadband connection with higher maximum download and upload speeds than Viasat (250Mbps/20Mbps compared to 150Mbps/3Mbps). Those facts could undoubtedly change as Starlink grows, but they're intriguing aspects of the pitch that could help set it apart from the competition. Once you consider the decent upload speed, these are considerable upgrades for anyone stuck with satellite internet. It did institute a still-generous 1TB cap in April (up to 6TB if you spend $1,500 monthly), after which users' speeds will be throttled until the end of the billing cycle. Lastly, while the equipment fee of $599 - and a whopping $2,500 for Starlink Priority - are steeper than those charged by HughesNet or Viasat, Starlink does not require a two-year contract.
The Priority tier offers a different satellite dish and equipment for higher download speeds but comes at a heftier price. Second, Starlink keeps things simple by going with only two satellite internet plans - Starlink Standard and Starlink Priority. It also features a latency of between 25 and 50 milliseconds, compared to HughesNet and Viasat's more typical range of 450 to 700ms. Granted, this satellite provider is still in its early stages - there's a waiting list at present and currently just over 500,000 active users across the globe - but the early results, as shared by CNET's own John Kim, are promising.įirst, at 25 to 220Mbps, the max download speeds are higher than HughesNet and Viasat's. When eccentric billionaire Elon Musk isn't garnering headlines for his tumultuous Twitter antics, he's making noteworthy progress with his company SpaceX's Starlink satellite internet project.
0 kommentar(er)
